View RSS Feed

melev

Photoshopping images - Why I bother

Rate this Entry
I got a compliment today regarding one of my recent images, as it was true to life. To me, what I share on the web needs to match as closely to what the eye sees, and I try my best to keep it accurate. A few years ago, I specifically remember a guest standing in front of my reef tank and they said "wow, your corals look like your pictures." I had to laugh, since that should be our goal after all. Still, we often see images of corals that look incredible and wonder why ours don't look as nice.

Keep in mind that lighting has a huge effect on how a coral appears, as does the color of your glass (standard versus Starphire) and acrylic. If the walls of the tank cast off a green sheen from film algae, that affects how the subjects will look. If your lights aren't ensconced in a canopy, our eyes will see a different color because they have to adapt to the cast off in the room. Water clarity is a big deal, and running fresh carbon often will take out the yellow/green/tan look of tank water.

When I take my pictures, I'm framing the shot to showcase the subject. I try to avoid reflections and if possible exclude what would otherwise spoil the shot. The glass needs to be clean, as does the lens of the camera. But after all that, in the end I have to download my images into the computer and that is when I do my post-processing work. It's not really a big deal. Cropping down to remove what isn't necessary (if desired), I adjust the levels to remove the blue or green haze of the image. If there are particulates spoiling the shot, a healing brush allows me to erase those tiny dots - not my favorite task and something I only do if the shot is really important to me. Lastly, I run unsharp mask to sharpen the image. Add a watermark, and "Save for web" so the image size isn't so big that you have to endure a lenghty download on your PC, Mac, or smartphone / tablet.

Here's my tutorial: http://www.melevsreef.com/pics/demo

And here's a before and after shot of some acans from last night.


Note how the sand is pretty close to white, and the valonia is the proper color green. Even the closed up Zoanthids look correct to the eye. Those delicate feather dusters stand out because of the Unsharp Mask, as do some of the Spaghetti Worm tentacles nearby. I cropped away the front area around these two Acans as you didn't need to see the wall of the aquarium.

This picture was shot through the surface of the water with the pumps off. The tank is too shallow for me to use a topdown photo box and still be far enough away to focus. Focal length can be annoying with certain lenses and cameras.

Submit "Photoshopping images - Why I bother" to Digg Submit "Photoshopping images - Why I bother" to del.icio.us Submit "Photoshopping images - Why I bother" to StumbleUpon Submit "Photoshopping images - Why I bother" to Google

Categories
Photography/Video

Comments

  1. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    Marc, thank for the refresher. I read though some of your photography articles today, as well as the site you linked to from your home page. I just did a bit more playing around with my little digicam and IrfanView. Here's the best one, much better than what I was getting the last couple days. I set the ISO back down to 100 and used a tripod and the delay timer to prevent any vibration.


    EDIT: Does anyone know what these polyps are? They don't look like the normal green stars.
  2. melev's Avatar
    They remind me of Daisy Polyps, but the ones I saw were fuller. Maybe these are limping along due to water quality and will improve in time.
  3. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    These are battling algae and the green sponge that's trying to over-run them.
  4. Jaxom's Avatar
    Marc what version of Photoshop are you using now.
  5. melev's Avatar
    PS 7.0 - I like it because I'm able to find the stuff I use frequently. I have CS4 and CS5, but default to 7.0 almost exclusively.
  6. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    From familiarity, or is there something you don't like about the newer versions? (I'll looking at getting CS6.0).

    Phil
  7. melev's Avatar
    Purely familiarity. I'm sure if I stuck with CS5 I'd get used to it like I did 7.0.
  8. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    OK, one more photography question. I remember a couple years back you mentioned you'd gotten a new macro lens you really liked for reef photography, what was it again?

    Thanks.
    Phil

    P.S. My D5100 will be delivered any minute now.
  9. melev's Avatar
    I have a Nikkor 105 AF/S lens. Does great when I pull out the tripod.
  10. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    OK, I'll add that to my list. I was looking at a 40mm AF-S for aquarium macro work. My camera came with an 18-55mm. I played around with it a bit last night, but didn't get any good aquarium shots. I definitly need a better tripod first and formost.
  11. SoLiD's Avatar
    Also try adjusting the custom white balancing if your camera has it (it should). This helped me take pictures that didn't need any post processing. HTH
  12. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    Always do, but for some reason I can't get my D5100 to set the white ballance to the tank lights. Always gives me an error "Can't read Data". So I typically use the bright sunlight setting and adjust the raw images with Nikon View.
  13. SoLiD's Avatar
    For "Custom" White Balance, you usually need to take a picture of "Something Naturally White" like a white sheet of paper illuminated by the Aquarium Lighting. Then tell your Custom White Balance to use that picture for White Balancing.
  14. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    And I get the above error message. Works in any other type of light though.
  15. melev's Avatar
    Try drawing a big plus sign on the white paper for the camera to focus on. Pencil, or ink. Not too thick though.
  16. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    Bingo! That did the trick. Thanks Marc. More photos coming soon.
  17. melev's Avatar
    Glad it helped. Cameras tend to try to focus and when you can't, it refuses to cooperate.
  18. Alaska_Phil's Avatar
    Well, here's the result.